Jump to content
q
Peter J Pilkington
Peter J Pilkington
Sign in to follow this  

Ask your Congressman why ?

    The following is a note all US Citizen might consider sending to their elected representatives. The United States Coast Guard has been sitting on the revised Federal Code of Regulation revisions as they pertain to commercial diving for 14 years. Copy and paste the following letter, send it to your elected representative asking why are commercial divers dying at a rate 40 times more often than those in the rest of the work force. Ask why this proposed rulemaking has been held in committee for 14 years. Ask your congressman to require the USCG to do the job we as citizens have entrusted them to do.

    You can send it by US mail, e-mail or both.

(Enter your congressperson’s name here)

(Enter your congressman’s address, either local or in Washington D.C.)

The following link has the address you will need

http://www.house.gov/representatives/

Reference: United States Coast Guard Proposed Rulemaking, Docket ID USCG 1998-3786

Commercial diving safety reform

(June 1, 2012 )

Dear (Congressman)

On June 26, 1998 the United States Coast Guard published a notice in the Federal Register that they would be seeking comments regarding the need to update the commercial diving operations regulations. The request goes on to state that “the regulations are over 20 years old and do not include current safety and technology standards and industry practices.” That request for comment garnered ninety two public submissions in addition to submissions from the Commercial Dive School Educators and other industry groups.

On September 29, 1998 a second notice was published extending the time persons and organizations would have to submit comments on the need revisions for 45 days.

On June 22, 1999 the United States Coast Guard held a formal Investigation which in part was focused on the need to reform and re-write the commercial diving regulations.

(See or refer to the Investigation into the events aboard the Cliffs 12.)

In April of 2001 the then Commandant of the United States Coast Guard, Admiral James M.

Loy, released the “findings in fact” that were an outgrowth of that formal investigation. That “finding in fact” included twenty six recommendations for major revisions to the existing Code of Federal Regulations as they pertain to commercial diving.

In November of 2008 the United States Coast Guard posted those same “findings in fact” as part of the proposed rulemaking procedure.

On January 6, 2009 the United States Coast Guard once again opened a public comment period as part of the proposed rulemaking by posting a notice in the Federal Register. That notice was essentially the same as the notice published on June 26, 1998, which was more than 10 years prior, with the exception of the reference to the formal investigation held in June of 1999.

(The Cliffs 12 Report.)

This proposed Rulemaking into the need to reform the Federal Regulations as they pertain to Commercial Diving has now been ongoing for 14 years. According to the notice in the 1998 Federal Register the regulations at that time were out dated, for over 20 years, and did not reflect industry standards or practice. That condition has not changed. Since 1998 there have been 273 deaths from diving accidents according to USCG records under USCG jurisdiction. Most of these fatalities occurred during commercial diving activities.

Commercial divers continue to be adversely effected by the lack of proper, enforceable and responsible regulations.

On January 14, 2009 the USCG, National Offshore Safety Committee released a report, written in April 2008 regarding their recommendations for revisions to the current 46CFR. A report formulated without any input from actual working divers. Those recommendations did not include any of the 26 recommendations addressed in Admiral Loy’s “Findings in Fact” associated with the Cliffs 12 investigation, did not include the requirements for minimum training, skills, knowledge, and made no recommendation for minimum crew sizes other than the one that already exists.

We are writing today to request that the United States Coast Guard provide a timetable for when we might reasonably expect to have an opportunity to review the proposed 46 CFR Part 197. Further we would request that a date and location be established where concerned citizens will have the opportunity to review and comment in a public arena the proposed revisions.

In advance I would like to thank you for your assistance in this matter and if there is any information or assistance we can offer please do not hesitate to contact me or any of those concerned parties listed below.

Respectfully,

(Your name)

(Address)

(Phone number)

Cc:

Robert.L.Smith@uscg.mil

Info@thediversassociation.com


Sign in to follow this  


User Feedback

Recommended Comments

It has to be embarrassing for the Coasties that their management will not move on this; after all, the US was (in the past) a leader in worker's rights, fair treatment and safety. Very sad to see it go so far downhill that they have to be forced to act.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to wonder whether the USCG are being prevented from implementing their code by outside political forces perhaps lobbied by major stakeholders who do not wish to incur extra costs. Is that a possibility? It does seem strange that having drawn up the code so long ago they should still delay implementation because, after all, what do they have to lose?

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hal, my feelings exactly. Fourteen years in committee and nothing done! It really is disgraceful. That the US rule makers are dragging their feet is largely due to the cozy relationship between government and industry, and further demonstrates that their "Safety First" slogans are just an illusion meant to lull the worker into believing that they take safety seriously. Nothing could be further from the truth as Peter has described here. This means that the death toll can be as high as they like because the people in charge don't care and do not count the tombstones.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nick,

No question the USCG has had their hands tied by an industry that would like the regulations as currently written to remain. Theses outdated, unenforceable regulations do little to protect the man at the end of the hose but offer tremendous protection for the men that labor behind desks. There are many within the industry that would like to see reform unfortunately their voices are seldom heard. The following is a series of questions answered under oath by a former chairman of the ADCI safety and education (Dennis Jahde) asked during a USCG hearing focused on commercial diving safety

Attorney for Cliffs Drilling: As we go back to these Coast Guard regulations – and what I’m hearing is that there’s a problem because you’ve got the regulations which kind of set a minimum standard and they’re somewhat vague and then you have the diving companies trying to figure out, well, if you’re a bigger company, you know, there’s kind of a problem because you may have a small company trying to just interpret those standards as tight as they can and the bigger company has a hard time competing on the same job – is that correct?

Mr. Dennis Jahde: Yes.

Attorney for Cliffs Drilling: And, in fact, you think that these regulations should be changed and the diving industry would benefit if they had a four-man crew, don’t you?

Mr. Dennis Jahde: I think there’s things in these regulations that could be a lot clearer, and yes, I think there’s some things that need to be changed.

That was thirteen years ago. It is not the men and women that wear the uniforms of the USCG that have held the revisions in limbo it is the men that control the USCG. The only way this will change is to demand that congress intervene. Send a note to your congressman and demand that these regulations be released from behind closed doors. If enough congressman start asking the question perhaps those doors that have been sealed theses past fourteen years will be opened

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.